Ganesh Ashok Kale vs Sarita Food Product Pvt Ltd @ Sitaram Pandurang Ubhare Advocate - DHAMANKAR KAUSTUBH VIDYADHAR — 530/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG110011392017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
966/2017
Filing Date
29-09-2017
Registration No
530/2017
Registration Date
29-09-2017
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
Police Station
Mangaon Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Ashok Kale
Adv. Metha Mohan Velji
Respondent(s)
Sarita Food Product Pvt Ltd @ Sitaram Pandurang Ubhare Advocate - DHAMANKAR KAUSTUBH VIDYADHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 02-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 11-12-2025 | Dismissal Order | |
| 01-10-2025 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mangaon dismissed Regular Criminal Case No. 530/2017 in default on 13.03.2026. The case, filed in 2017, was dismissed because the complainant and his advocate failed to proceed with the case for an extended period and remained absent despite a prior warning order dated 11.12.2025, indicating loss of interest in pursuing the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mangaon dismissed Regular Criminal Case No. 530/2017 in default on 13.03.2026. The case, filed in 2017, was dismissed because the complainant and his advocate failed to proceed with the case for an extended period and remained absent despite a prior warning order dated 11.12.2025, indicating loss of interest in pursuing the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts