State of Maharashtra vs Sameer Madhavan Nair Advocate - S. S. Kadu — 124/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG110011292022

Hearing

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1001/2022

Filing Date

12-10-2022

Registration No

124/2022

Registration Date

12-10-2022

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon

Judge

2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

265

Police Station

Mangaon Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379,

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sameer Madhavan Nair Advocate - S. S. Kadu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

09-03-2026

Hearing

27-01-2026

Hearing

18-12-2025

Hearing

10-11-2025

Hearing

26-09-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

18-04-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Outcome: Discharge application rejected; charge to be framed The court rejected the accused Sameer's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC in a theft case involving soil taken from an ex-MLA's plot. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to frame charges, holding that while the accused claimed initial consent was given, critical questions about whether soil was taken after consent revocation require a full trial with evidence. The court noted that detailed factual findings cannot be made at the charge-framing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Outcome: Discharge application rejected; charge to be framed The court rejected the accused Sameer's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC in a theft case involving soil taken from an ex-MLA's plot. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to frame charges, holding that while the accused claimed initial consent was given, critical questions about whether soil was taken after consent revocation require a full trial with evidence. The court noted that detailed factual findings cannot be made at the charge-framing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case