State of Maharashtra vs Sameer Madhavan Nair Advocate - S. S. Kadu — 124/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG110011292022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1001/2022
Filing Date
12-10-2022
Registration No
124/2022
Registration Date
12-10-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
265
Police Station
Mangaon Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sameer Madhavan Nair Advocate - S. S. Kadu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 10-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 26-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Outcome: Discharge application rejected; charge to be framed The court rejected the accused Sameer's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC in a theft case involving soil taken from an ex-MLA's plot. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to frame charges, holding that while the accused claimed initial consent was given, critical questions about whether soil was taken after consent revocation require a full trial with evidence. The court noted that detailed factual findings cannot be made at the charge-framing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Outcome: Discharge application rejected; charge to be framed The court rejected the accused Sameer's application for discharge under Section 239 CrPC in a theft case involving soil taken from an ex-MLA's plot. The court found prima facie sufficient grounds to frame charges, holding that while the accused claimed initial consent was given, critical questions about whether soil was taken after consent revocation require a full trial with evidence. The court noted that detailed factual findings cannot be made at the charge-framing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts