State of Maharashtra vs Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun — 314/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG110006922022
Filing Number
604/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
314/2022
Registration Date
11-07-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
141
Police Station
Mangaon Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts