State of Maharashtra vs Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun — 314/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG110006922022

Filing Number

604/2022

Filing Date

11-Jul-2022

Registration No

314/2022

Registration Date

11-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon

Judge

2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Mangaon Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  18. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

  19. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  20. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  21. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  22. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  23. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  24. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  25. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  26. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  27. 24-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  28. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  29. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  30. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  31. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  32. 26-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  33. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  34. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  35. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  36. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  37. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  38. 29-May-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  39. 21-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  40. 21-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  41. 18-Jan-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  42. 18-Nov-2022

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  43. 16-Sep-2022

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J. M. F.C. Mangaon

  44. 25-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 11-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case