State of Maharashtra vs Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun — 314/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG110006922022

Case disposed

Filing Number

604/2022

Filing Date

11-07-2022

Registration No

314/2022

Registration Date

11-07-2022

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon

Judge

2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Mangaon Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shidhesh Sharad Mane Advocate - Mhatre Prakash Arun

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgment

26-02-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

Arguments

23-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shidhesh Sharad Mane (Case 314/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Shidhesh Sharad Mane, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 in a motor accident case. The court found that while a collision occurred between the accused's Ertiga car and the complainant's two-wheeler on May 23, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove negligent or reckless driving beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps in evidence included the Ertiga's front tire being punctured at the time of accident—a mechanical failure that could have caused the collision independent of the driver's conduct—which was not adequately investigated or ruled out by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case