The State vs Appasaheb Manik Garje Advocate - Limje Rajesh Khemchand — 433/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG110006362019
Filing Number
636/2019
Filing Date
19-08-2019
Registration No
433/2019
Registration Date
19-08-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Goregaon Police Station.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Appasaheb Manik Garje Advocate - Limje Rajesh Khemchand
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Appasaheb Manik Garje (433/2019) The court acquitted the accused Appasaheb Manik Garje of charges under IPC Section 279 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 184-185, finding insufficient evidence to prove he drove an ST bus recklessly and while intoxicated on March 22, 2019. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused an accident by colliding with barricades during a police checkpoint, citing credibility gaps in witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and missing medical/documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Appasaheb Manik Garje (433/2019) The court acquitted the accused Appasaheb Manik Garje of charges under IPC Section 279 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 184-185, finding insufficient evidence to prove he drove an ST bus recklessly and while intoxicated on March 22, 2019. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused an accident by colliding with barricades during a police checkpoint, citing credibility gaps in witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and missing medical/documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts