Newandaram Alidas Karira vs Dilip Sitaram Jadhav Advocate - Aniket Thakur — 54/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG110005302021
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
173/2021
Filing Date
10-06-2021
Registration No
54/2021
Registration Date
10-06-2021
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Newandaram Alidas Karira
Adv. Ghayal Vinod Umakant
Respondent(s)
Dilip Sitaram Jadhav Advocate - Aniket Thakur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 04-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 23-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 54/2021 Summary Order Date: 11 March 2025 The court granted the petition and ordered that Dolly Prakashchand Jain, Manojkumar Champapalal, and M. Sanjayakumar Jain be impleaded as defendants in the suit. The court found them to be essential parties since the suit concerns specific performance of a contract and decree execution, with these individuals being subsequent purchasers of the disputed property through sale deeds executed during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 54/2021 Summary Order Date: 11 March 2025 The court granted the petition and ordered that Dolly Prakashchand Jain, Manojkumar Champapalal, and M. Sanjayakumar Jain be impleaded as defendants in the suit. The court found them to be essential parties since the suit concerns specific performance of a contract and decree execution, with these individuals being subsequent purchasers of the disputed property through sale deeds executed during the pendency of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts