Chetana Mandesh Mhamunkar vs Kisan Hrichandra Mhamunkar Advocate - Andhere Santosh Shantaram — 50/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG110003132017
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
62/2017
Filing Date
30-03-2017
Registration No
50/2017
Registration Date
31-03-2017
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chetana Mandesh Mhamunkar
Adv. Kadam Seema Nilesh
Respondent(s)
Kisan Hrichandra Mhamunkar Advocate - Andhere Santosh Shantaram
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application with costs. The petitioner sought appointment of a court commissioner to determine possession of two rooms (totaling 936 sq. ft.) in house property no. 88, part 01, which the petitioner claims are in the respondent's possession. Since there is a genuine dispute between the parties regarding possession of the disputed rooms and the petitioner has made allegations supported by documents, the court found it appropriate to appoint a court commissioner to gather evidence on the matter and submit a report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application with costs. The petitioner sought appointment of a court commissioner to determine possession of two rooms (totaling 936 sq. ft.) in house property no. 88, part 01, which the petitioner claims are in the respondent's possession. Since there is a genuine dispute between the parties regarding possession of the disputed rooms and the petitioner has made allegations supported by documents, the court found it appropriate to appoint a court commissioner to gather evidence on the matter and submit a report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts