Julekha Suleman Mapkar vs Chintaman Sahadev Birvadkar Advocate - Thakur Devdatta Murlidhar — 12/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG110001212023
Filing Number
26/2023
Filing Date
07-Feb-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
07-Feb-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mangaon
Judge
2-Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Julekha Suleman Mapkar
Adv. Yelukar Sadaf anvar
-
2.Irfan ali Mapkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chintaman Sahadev Birvadkar Advocate - Thakur Devdatta Murlidhar
-
2.Mahadev Dagadu Pawar
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
16-Feb-2026
Issues
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
09-Jan-2026
Issues
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
25-Nov-2025
Issues
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
14-Oct-2025
Issues
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
20-Aug-2025
Issues
Jt. C. J. J. D. and J. M. F. C. Mangaon
-
18-Jun-2025
Issues
-
22-Mar-2025
Issues
-
24-Feb-2025
Issues
-
01-Feb-2025
Issues
-
07-Jan-2025
Issues
-
19-Dec-2024
Issues
-
27-Nov-2024
Issues
-
22-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
09-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
18-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
09-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
31-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
02-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
21-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
29-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
02-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
03-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
07-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
02-Jan-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 12/2023 Summary: In RCS 12/2023, Julekha Suleman Mapkar v. Chitaman Sahadev Birwadkar, the 3rd Joint Civil Judge at Mangaon, Dist. Raigad, ordered on 02.01.2024 that the matter be sent for mediation. Both parties and their advocates were present; advocates confirmed settlement chances existed between them, and the court found elements of settlement present, making mediation appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
04-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
04-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
07-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
27-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
31-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
02-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
19-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
05-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
27-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
08-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
27-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
15-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
15-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt C J J D and J M F C Mangaon
-
01-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
20-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
15-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
09-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2023
Case 12/2023 Summary: In RCS 12/2023, Julekha Suleman Mapkar v. Chitaman Sahadev Birwadkar, the 3rd Joint Civil Judge at Mangaon, Dist. Raigad, ordered on 02.01.2024 that the matter be sent for mediation. Both parties and their advocates were present; advocates confirmed settlement chances existed between them, and the court found elements of settlement present, making mediation appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts