The State Through Mahad City Police Station vs Santosh Tukaram Dhondge — 523/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG100010742024
Filing Number
814/2024
Filing Date
07-Dec-2024
Registration No
523/2024
Registration Date
07-Dec-2024
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
148
Police Station
Mahad Town Police Stn.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Through Mahad City Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Tukaram Dhondge
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for an offense under Section 65e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analyzer report despite multiple opportunities, the statutory limitation to file the report had expired, and there was no further progress in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
05-Jan-2026
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
03-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
21-Aug-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
22-Jul-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
24-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
24-Jan-2025
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
11-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 523/2024
The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for an offense under Section 65e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analyzer report despite multiple opportunities, the statutory limitation to file the report had expired, and there was no further progress in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts