Prabhakar Sitaram Mahasksar vs Mamata Mahesh Patil Advocate - Pawar K.M. — 36/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG100008422023
e-Filing Number
14-06-2023
Filing Number
117/2023
Filing Date
10-Jul-2023
Registration No
36/2023
Registration Date
10-Jul-2023
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prabhakar Sitaram Mahasksar
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
2.Sadanand Kashiram Mahaskar
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
3.Alka Sunil Paradule
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
4.Abhishek Madukar Mahaskar
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
5.Bharati Kalapesh Bagade
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
6.Kamalakar Shivram Mahaskar
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
-
7.Kashinath Dattaram Vangule
Adv. JANGAM PRITI PANCHAKSHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mamata Mahesh Patil Advocate - Pawar K.M.
-
2.Manthan Mahesha Patil
-
3.Amay Mahesha Patil
-
4.Sandip Kisan Dandawate
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-3 to condone a 120-day delay in filing their written statement has been allowed. The court found sufficient grounds for condonation, considering the hardship faced by defendant 1 (a widow managing sole responsibilities) and the remote location of their residence. The delay is condoned subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
07-Apr-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
10-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
24-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
19-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
15-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
30-Oct-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
13-Sep-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
25-Aug-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
13-Aug-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
28-Jul-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
24-Jul-2025
Reconciliation
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
22-Jul-2025
Reconciliation
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
21-Jun-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
05-May-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
25-Mar-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
27-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
22-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
20-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
23-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
20-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
15-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
26-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
02-May-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
11-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
01-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
02-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
05-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
01-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr.dvn. J.M.F.C Mahad
-
10-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2023
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-3 to condone a 120-day delay in filing their written statement has been allowed. The court found sufficient grounds for condonation, considering the hardship faced by defendant 1 (a widow managing sole responsibilities) and the remote location of their residence. The delay is condoned subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts