Avesh Hyder Kazi vs Deepak Subhash Vishwakarma — 414/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG100006792025
e-Filing Number
08-08-2025
Filing Number
620/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
414/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Mahad Taluka Police Stn.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Avesh Hyder Kazi
Adv. KOLTHARKAR SUVIDYA SUBODH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepak Subhash Vishwakarma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Lok Adalat disposed of Case No. 414/2026 between petitioner Auesh Hyaler Karzi and respondent Deepak Subhash Vidhwalkarmon by recording a settlement reached between the parties. The award section indicates the dispute was resolved through compromise/settlement, with the parties informed that any court fees paid shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
10-Mar-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
06-Mar-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
02-Mar-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
15-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
15-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
19-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
18-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 414/2025
The Lok Adalat disposed of Case No. 414/2026 between petitioner Auesh Hyaler Karzi and respondent Deepak Subhash Vidhwalkarmon by recording a settlement reached between the parties. The award section indicates the dispute was resolved through compromise/settlement, with the parties informed that any court fees paid shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts