Vilas Shantaram Dayate vs Sambhaji Mahadev Dayate Advocate - Jadhav R. R. — 38/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG100006322025
e-Filing Number
31-07-2025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
02-Aug-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
02-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vilas Shantaram Dayate
Adv. Deshmukh A. Kadir
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sambhaji Mahadev Dayate Advocate - Jadhav R. R.
-
2.Prabhakar Sambhaji Dayate
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
12-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application for delay condonation in filing a defamation suit against two elderly defendants, imposed costs of Rs. 750/- on the petitioner, and adjourned the hearing of the defendants' bail application and reply to a subsequent date pending compliance with the cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
07-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
06-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
06-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
09-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
04-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2025
Case Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application for delay condonation in filing a defamation suit against two elderly defendants, imposed costs of Rs. 750/- on the petitioner, and adjourned the hearing of the defendants' bail application and reply to a subsequent date pending compliance with the cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts