The State Through Poladpur Police Station vs Aaditya Satish Pavar Advocate - Rajesh A. Sheth — 108/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281,125,(अे)125(बी). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG100005542025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
502/2025
Filing Date
09-07-2025
Registration No
108/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Poladpur Police Stn.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Poladpur Police Station
Respondent(s)
Aaditya Satish Pavar Advocate - Rajesh A. Sheth
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 10-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted 19-year-old Aditya Satish Pawar of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 281, 106(1), 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicles Act 1988 sections 184, 3(1)181. The accused was charged with rash/negligent driving of a scooter that caused an accident resulting in the death of Raj Vinod Kdum on 13/05/2025. The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or that his actions directly caused the death, as key witness testimony was inadequate and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted 19-year-old Aditya Satish Pawar of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 281, 106(1), 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicles Act 1988 sections 184, 3(1)181. The accused was charged with rash/negligent driving of a scooter that caused an accident resulting in the death of Raj Vinod Kdum on 13/05/2025. The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or that his actions directly caused the death, as key witness testimony was inadequate and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts