The State Through Poladpur Police Station vs Aaditya Satish Pavar Advocate - Rajesh A. Sheth — 108/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281,125,(अे)125(बी). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG100005542025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

502/2025

Filing Date

09-07-2025

Registration No

108/2025

Registration Date

09-07-2025

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

Poladpur Police Stn.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281,125,(अे)125(बी)
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184,3(1)181

Petitioner(s)

The State Through Poladpur Police Station

Respondent(s)

Aaditya Satish Pavar Advocate - Rajesh A. Sheth

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

09-03-2026

Disposed

13-02-2026

Arguments

29-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

24-12-2025

Hearing

10-11-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted 19-year-old Aditya Satish Pawar of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 281, 106(1), 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicles Act 1988 sections 184, 3(1)181. The accused was charged with rash/negligent driving of a scooter that caused an accident resulting in the death of Raj Vinod Kdum on 13/05/2025. The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or that his actions directly caused the death, as key witness testimony was inadequate and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted 19-year-old Aditya Satish Pawar of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 281, 106(1), 125(a), 125(b) and Motor Vehicles Act 1988 sections 184, 3(1)181. The accused was charged with rash/negligent driving of a scooter that caused an accident resulting in the death of Raj Vinod Kdum on 13/05/2025. The court found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or that his actions directly caused the death, as key witness testimony was inadequate and contradictory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case