The State Through Poladpur Police Station vs Aadesh Aagesh Gaykwad — 96/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG100001782026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

96/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Poladpur Police Stn.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Through Poladpur Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aadesh Aagesh Gaykwad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Maharashtra court found the accused guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for creating obstruction and damage to public property on February 24, 2026. The court convicted the 35-year-old accused (Aadesh Agarosh Gayakwad) of rash and negligent conduct causing injury to persons and property, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,000 with 15 days simple imprisonment in default, emphasizing reform and education. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Maharashtra court found the accused guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for creating obstruction and damage to public property on February 24, 2026. The court convicted the 35-year-old accused (Aadesh Agarosh Gayakwad) of rash and negligent conduct causing injury to persons and property, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,000 with 15 days simple imprisonment in default, emphasizing reform and education. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case