Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete vs Mahad Shahar Police Station — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 505,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG100001762026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete
Adv. KOLTHARKAR SUVIDYA SUBODH
Respondent(s)
Mahad Shahar Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 02-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 27-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts