Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete vs Mahad Shahar Police Station — 28/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 505. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG100001762026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

158/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 505

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete

    Adv. KOLTHARKAR SUVIDYA SUBODH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahad Shahar Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case