Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete vs Mahad Shahar Police Station — 28/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 505,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG100001762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

158/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 505,

Petitioner(s)

Mahamad Zafar Abdulmajeed Geete

Adv. KOLTHARKAR SUVIDYA SUBODH

Respondent(s)

Mahad Shahar Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

18-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Reply/Say

02-04-2026

Reply/Say

27-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mahad City court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Jeeto Minivan, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding no purpose in keeping the vehicle unused at the police station where it would deteriorate. The court granted custody on strict conditions: furnishing a ₹4,00,000 indemnity bond, producing the vehicle for trial evidence as required, and prohibiting sale, transfer, or alterations until case disposal and any illegal use. The police were directed to photograph the vehicle, prepare detailed panchanama (inventory), and inform the RTO before handing over possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case