The State Through Mahad City Police Station vs Rajaram Ramkarn Bhardvaj — 94/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG100001742026

Filing Number

156/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

94/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

Mahad Town Police Stn.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Through Mahad City Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajaram Ramkarn Bhardvaj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Mahad First Class Magistrate Court found defendant Rajaram Ramkaran Bharadwaj guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for obstructing public roads by placing his fruit-selling cart on a public road in Mahad, causing significant congestion and obstruction to traffic on February 26, 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 94/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Mahad First Class Magistrate Court found defendant Rajaram Ramkaran Bharadwaj guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for obstructing public roads by placing his fruit-selling cart on a public road in Mahad, causing significant congestion and obstruction to traffic on February 26, 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case