The State Through Excise Dpt. Mahad vs Dilip Dashrath Shinde Advocate - Kiran Deshmukh — 59/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG100001312024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
87/2024
Filing Date
06-02-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
06-02-2024
Court
Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad
Judge
2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
06
Police Station
State Excise DepartmentMahad-Poladpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Excise Dpt. Mahad
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Dilip Dashrath Shinde Advocate - Kiran Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 11-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 10-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dilip Dasharath Shinde under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023 in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, citing prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity and the principal witness remaining unexamined. The seized contraband was directed for disposal with the Excise Superintendent, and the bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dilip Dasharath Shinde under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023 in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, citing prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity and the principal witness remaining unexamined. The seized contraband was directed for disposal with the Excise Superintendent, and the bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts