SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LTD RECOVERY OFFICER SHRI ALKESH HARISHCHANDRA SAKPAL vs Vinod Bajrang Salunkhe — 47/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG100000712025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2025

Filing Number

60/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad

Judge

2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LTD RECOVERY OFFICER SHRI ALKESH HARISHCHANDRA SAKPAL

Adv. MOHITE POONAM SIDDHARTH

Respondent(s)

Vinod Bajrang Salunkhe

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Mahad

14-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

09-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

05-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

06-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

06-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court issued process against the accused for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. A cheque for Rs. 1,02,252/- issued by the accused was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite service of a statutory notice, the accused failed to make payment. The court found a prima facie case established based on documentary evidence and proceeded without witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court issued process against the accused for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. A cheque for Rs. 1,02,252/- issued by the accused was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite service of a statutory notice, the accused failed to make payment. The court found a prima facie case established based on documentary evidence and proceeded without witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge,J.D. and J.M.F.C., Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case