State of Maharashtra through Roha POlice Station vs Rajesh Shamji jahangir and 1 other — 1093/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),27. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090013422025
Filing Number
1251/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
1093/2025
Registration Date
12-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Roha POlice Station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajesh Shamji jahangir and 1 other
-
2.Vasim Mansun Dange
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court convicted both respondents, Rajesh Shamji Jahangir and Vasim Mansun Dange, under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and IPC Section 1985 for criminal intimidation and misbehavior. Each respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (with alternative imprisonment of one month if fine is not paid), and ordered to pay additional compensation of Rs. 16,000 each to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
26-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1093/2025
The court convicted both respondents, Rajesh Shamji Jahangir and Vasim Mansun Dange, under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and IPC Section 1985 for criminal intimidation and misbehavior. Each respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (with alternative imprisonment of one month if fine is not paid), and ordered to pay additional compensation of Rs. 16,000 each to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts