State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag vs Umesh Eknath Ratate Advocate - Shinde M. K. — 651/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090010122024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
867/2024
Filing Date
27-12-2024
Registration No
651/2024
Registration Date
27-12-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
249
Police Station
Kolad Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
Umesh Eknath Ratate Advocate - Shinde M. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Disposed
Report
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-01-2026 | Report | |
| 28-10-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 29-07-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 27-05-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 due to the prosecution's failure to file the mandatory chemical analysis report despite over 14 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed. The proceedings were stopped under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the case could not proceed without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 due to the prosecution's failure to file the mandatory chemical analysis report despite over 14 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed. The proceedings were stopped under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the case could not proceed without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts