Abdul Salam Ahamad Pathan through P.O.Attorney Nasrin A.Salam Pathan etc.1 vs Rohidas Harishchandra Bhagat etc.1 Advocate - Patil M.D. — 78/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG090008582017
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2017
Filing Date
09-10-2017
Registration No
78/2017
Registration Date
09-10-2017
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Salam Ahamad Pathan through P.O.Attorney Nasrin A.Salam Pathan etc.1
Adv. Sanap S.N.,K.D.More,S.A.Hafiz
Nasareen A. Salam Pathan
Respondent(s)
Rohidas Harishchandra Bhagat etc.1 Advocate - Patil M.D.
Shri Santosh Harishchanra Bhagat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 14-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a Marathi language court order from case R.S.U.N. 78/2017 (Abdul Pathan v. Rohidas Bhagat) dated 13.03.2020. The court admitted various affidavits, documents, and exhibits submitted by both the plaintiff and defendants, including property assessments, notices, photographs, and certified copies of land records. The case was adjourned for further hearing before the defendant's counsel on a subsequent date, with the court marking multiple exhibits and documentary evidence for record purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a Marathi language court order from case R.S.U.N. 78/2017 (Abdul Pathan v. Rohidas Bhagat) dated 13.03.2020. The court admitted various affidavits, documents, and exhibits submitted by both the plaintiff and defendants, including property assessments, notices, photographs, and certified copies of land records. The case was adjourned for further hearing before the defendant's counsel on a subsequent date, with the court marking multiple exhibits and documentary evidence for record purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts