State of Maharashtra through Nagothane Police Station vs Taee Ramu Waghmare Advocate - Deshmukh N.G. — 467/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090008032024

Case disposed

Filing Number

669/2024

Filing Date

29-11-2024

Registration No

467/2024

Registration Date

29-11-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

Nagothane Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through Nagothane Police Station

Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

Taee Ramu Waghmare Advocate - Deshmukh N.G.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

12-03-2026

Disposed

13-01-2026

Plea / Particulars

17-10-2025

Plea / Particulars

22-07-2025

Plea / Particulars

06-05-2025

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The critical reason was that despite 18 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 29.11.2024, the prosecution failed to submit the chemical analysis report necessary to prove the liquor seizure, rendering conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The critical reason was that despite 18 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 29.11.2024, the prosecution failed to submit the chemical analysis report necessary to prove the liquor seizure, rendering conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case