Anant Ramu Sanap vs Hon Sarpanch Vrushali Sanjay Mandaluskar Office Gram Panchayat Pui — 39/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Depositing Amount Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG090007972025

e-Filing Number

10-06-2025

Filing Number

59/2025

Filing Date

13-Jun-2025

Registration No

39/2025

Registration Date

13-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anant Ramu Sanap

    Adv. DESHMUKH NANA GANGARAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hon Sarpanch Vrushali Sanjay Mandaluskar Office Gram Panchayat Pui

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Depositing Amount

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Civil Judge allowed Defendant No. 3's (Deputy Engineer, PWD) application to set aside the 'No Written Statement' order despite his failure to file within 90 days of being served summons. The court permitted him to file his written statement to ensure proper adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, imposing a cost of Rs. 300/- payable to the plaintiff as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  9. 31-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  10. 13-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 13-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge allowed Defendant No. 3's (Deputy Engineer, PWD) application to set aside the 'No Written Statement' order despite his failure to file within 90 days of being served summons. The court permitted him to file his written statement to ensure proper adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, imposing a cost of Rs. 300/- payable to the plaintiff as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case