Amol Himtrao Patil vs Mhendra Madhukar Ghag Advocate - Shinde M.N. — 393/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090007472019

B.W._Unready

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

632/2019

Filing Date

18-09-2019

Registration No

393/2019

Registration Date

18-09-2019

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Amol Himtrao Patil

Adv. Varma D. M.

Respondent(s)

Mhendra Madhukar Ghag Advocate - Shinde M.N.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

10-03-2026

B.W._Unready

27-02-2026

B.W._Unready

08-01-2026

B.W._Unready

10-10-2025

B.W._Unready

10-07-2025

B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

18-09-2019
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary This is a criminal case (CrPC 2019, Section 200) under the Indian Penal Code. The court issued directions against the accused (Amol Patil) under Section 204 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 1,25,000. The court ordered that a criminal case be initiated against the accused with summons to be issued, and prescribed conditions for settlement including penalty amounts (10-20% of the cheque value) payable to the District Legal Services Authority at different stages if the accused opts for compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a criminal case (CrPC 2019, Section 200) under the Indian Penal Code. The court issued directions against the accused (Amol Patil) under Section 204 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 1,25,000. The court ordered that a criminal case be initiated against the accused with summons to be issued, and prescribed conditions for settlement including penalty amounts (10-20% of the cheque value) payable to the District Legal Services Authority at different stages if the accused opts for compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case