Sujata Bhaskar Ghag vs Shantaram Sakharam Lendi Advocate - Sawant R.B. — 81/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG090006492018

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

125/2018

Filing Date

14-08-2018

Registration No

81/2018

Registration Date

14-08-2018

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Sujata Bhaskar Ghag

Adv. Shinde M.N./Dandekar/Gund/Padwal

Respondent(s)

Shantaram Sakharam Lendi Advocate - Sawant R.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

31-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

10-03-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

10-02-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

13-12-2025

Amended W.S.

21-11-2025

Amended W.S.

Interim Orders

13-12-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (Petition No. 27) filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding encroachment of 73.70 square meters on property. The court directed the plaintiff to execute the settlement/compromise within 14 days and file the rectified case record along with a copy to the defendant. The court found that a complete and final resolution of the dispute through the proposed settlement was necessary rather than a partial remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (Petition No. 27) filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding encroachment of 73.70 square meters on property. The court directed the plaintiff to execute the settlement/compromise within 14 days and file the rectified case record along with a copy to the defendant. The court found that a complete and final resolution of the dispute through the proposed settlement was necessary rather than a partial remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case