State of Maharashtra through Roha Police Station vs Prajakta Pandurang Kaskar Advocate - Shinde M. K. — 388/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090006462024
Filing Number
540/2024
Filing Date
06-11-2024
Registration No
388/2024
Registration Date
06-11-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Roha Police Station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
Prajakta Pandurang Kaskar Advocate - Shinde M. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Disposed
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-01-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 01-11-2025 | Filing of Surety |
| 05-08-2025 | Filing of Surety |
| 20-05-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 by stopping proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The critical reason was that despite over 16 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 06.11.2024, the prosecution failed to submit the essential chemical analysis report proving the substance seized was liquor, making conviction impossible. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under applicable provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 by stopping proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The critical reason was that despite over 16 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 06.11.2024, the prosecution failed to submit the essential chemical analysis report proving the substance seized was liquor, making conviction impossible. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under applicable provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts