Sujata Bhaskar Ghag Death vs Dhakalya Parshuram Shid Advocate - Sawant R.B. — 78/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG090006462018
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
122/2018
Filing Date
14-08-2018
Registration No
78/2018
Registration Date
14-08-2018
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sujata Bhaskar Ghag Death
Adv. Shinde M.N./Dandekar/Gund/Padwal
1/1 Bhaskar govind ghag
1/2 laxmi satya b
1/3 lavnya krushna
1/4 Rupa Bi
Respondent(s)
Dhakalya Parshuram Shid Advocate - Sawant R.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 10-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 13-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint in this encroachment removal and injunction suit. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint and add prayers based on the court commissioner's report documenting illegal encroachment (a brick-cement house of 52.64 sq.m and shed of 12 sq.m). The court found the amendment imperative for proper adjudication and necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, while noting the defendant would have opportunity to file a consequential written statement in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint in this encroachment removal and injunction suit. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint and add prayers based on the court commissioner's report documenting illegal encroachment (a brick-cement house of 52.64 sq.m and shed of 12 sq.m). The court found the amendment imperative for proper adjudication and necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, while noting the defendant would have opportunity to file a consequential written statement in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts