State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag vs suraj Dhondu Bhoi — 356/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090005922024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

491/2024

Filing Date

10-10-2024

Registration No

356/2024

Registration Date

10-10-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

146

Police Station

Kolad Police station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag

Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

suraj Dhondu Bhoi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

10-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Filing of Surety

02-12-2025

Filing of Surety

09-09-2025

Filing of Surety

10-06-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to submit a chemical analysis report despite 1 year and 5 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 10.10.2024. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, ruling that without this crucial evidence, conviction was impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to submit a chemical analysis report despite 1 year and 5 months passing since the charge-sheet was filed on 10.10.2024. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, ruling that without this crucial evidence, conviction was impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case