State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag vs Pramila Honaji More — 354/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090005902024
Filing Number
489/2024
Filing Date
10-Oct-2024
Registration No
354/2024
Registration Date
10-Oct-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
Kolad Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra throuhg Inspector Excise Bharari Pathak No.1 Alibag
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pramila Honaji More
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, citing the prosecution's failure to file the mandatory chemical analysis report even after 1 year 5 months from the charge-sheet filing. The court halted proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, finding continuation futile without this critical evidence necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
03-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
20-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
25-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
28-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
17-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
19-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
10-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 354/2024
Summary: The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, citing the prosecution's failure to file the mandatory chemical analysis report even after 1 year 5 months from the charge-sheet filing. The court halted proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, finding continuation futile without this critical evidence necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts