Pradip Raghunath Deshmukh vs Vijay Gopinath Pawar — 316/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090005372024

Evidence

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

24-09-2024

Filing Number

442/2024

Filing Date

25-09-2024

Registration No

316/2024

Registration Date

25-09-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Pradip Raghunath Deshmukh

Adv. PATIL MEERA MAHENDRA

Respondent(s)

Vijay Gopinath Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

13-05-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

03-01-2026

Plea / Particulars

Interim Orders

03-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 316/2024 The Judicial Magistrate found a prima-facie case against accused Vijay Gopinath Pawar for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1988. The court issued process against the accused and directed summons to be served via speed post or registered post, as permitted to the complainant Pradip Raghunath Deshmukh. The special procedure under Section 142 of the NI Act applies, dispensing with the preliminary notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 316/2024 The Judicial Magistrate found a prima-facie case against accused Vijay Gopinath Pawar for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1988. The court issued process against the accused and directed summons to be served via speed post or registered post, as permitted to the complainant Pradip Raghunath Deshmukh. The special procedure under Section 142 of the NI Act applies, dispensing with the preliminary notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case