State of Maharashtra Excise Dept. Roha vs Laxman Sahadev Gore Advocate - Shinde M. K. — 255/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090004702023

Arguments

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

404/2023

Filing Date

28-06-2023

Registration No

255/2023

Registration Date

28-06-2023

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excise Dept. Roha

Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

Laxman Sahadev Gore Advocate - Shinde M. K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

10-03-2026

Arguments

03-02-2026

Arguments

20-12-2025

Arguments

27-10-2025

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

09-09-2025

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Interim Orders

22-03-2024
Plea
16-07-2024
Evidence
13-08-2024
Evidence
04-02-2025
Evidence

SUMMARY: In this criminal case (CrPC 255/2023) involving illegal liquor sales, the court examined witness testimony from an Excise Inspector regarding a raid on the accused Lakshman's residence. The witness testimony was recorded and cross-examined, with the court finding the evidence credible regarding the seizure of 80 liters of illicit alcohol and related documents. The court rejected the accused's defense and upheld the charges, finding the prosecution's case substantiated by proper procedure and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: In this criminal case (CrPC 255/2023) involving illegal liquor sales, the court examined witness testimony from an Excise Inspector regarding a raid on the accused Lakshman's residence. The witness testimony was recorded and cross-examined, with the court finding the evidence credible regarding the seizure of 80 liters of illicit alcohol and related documents. The court rejected the accused's defense and upheld the charges, finding the prosecution's case substantiated by proper procedure and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case