Maxine Pranjeet Saharia The Former Maxine Moses vs Kanu Laxman Bhoir — 68/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 156(3). Status: Verification. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Verification Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG090004652024

e-Filing Number

14-08-2024

Filing Number

379/2024

Filing Date

16-Aug-2024

Registration No

68/2024

Registration Date

16-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 156(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maxine Pranjeet Saharia The Former Maxine Moses

    Adv. BHAGAT JITENDRA VITHOBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanu Laxman Bhoir

  2. 2.Shivram Arjun Bamane

  3. 3.Maruti Narayan Konde

  4. 4.Raghunath Madhu Mohite

  5. 5.Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Bhoir

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  3. 04-Feb-2026

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  5. 05-Nov-2025

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  6. 04-Oct-2025

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  7. 02-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Court rejected the complainant's petition seeking FIR registration against five accused persons for alleged property fraud involving a false sale deed from 1969. The Court found insufficient evidence of cognizable offence, noting the complainant failed to produce the allegedly fraudulent deed, made bare allegations without proof, and inexplicably delayed filing the complaint for 55 years. The case is adjourned for verification of the complainant under Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    Verification

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  9. 01-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  10. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  12. 10-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  13. 09-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  14. 24-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  18. 20-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  19. 22-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  20. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha

  21. 16-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 16-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Court rejected the complainant's petition seeking FIR registration against five accused persons for alleged property fraud involving a false sale deed from 1969. The Court found insufficient evidence of cognizable offence, noting the complainant failed to produce the allegedly fraudulent deed, made bare allegations without proof, and inexplicably delayed filing the complaint for 55 years. The case is adjourned for verification of the complainant under Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case