Varsha Vasant Mamluskar and 2 others vs Vasant Aatmaram Mamluskar Advocate - Hafiz S.A. — 109/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,12. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG090004652023

Awaiting Warrant

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

400/2023

Filing Date

27-06-2023

Registration No

109/2023

Registration Date

27-06-2023

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,12

Petitioner(s)

Varsha Vasant Mamluskar and 2 others

Adv. Sawant D. R.

Respondent(s)

Vasant Aatmaram Mamluskar Advocate - Hafiz S.A.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

09-03-2026

Awaiting Warrant

09-02-2026

Awaiting Warrant

06-01-2026

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

02-12-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

11-11-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Interim Orders

28-11-2023
Order on T.I.

Summary The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹6,000 to the petitioner from the date of filing (27/06/2023) until final judgment, immediate custody of the two children to the petitioner, and directed a permanent living arrangement for the petitioner and children. The petition regarding residence was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of ₹6,000 to the petitioner from the date of filing (27/06/2023) until final judgment, immediate custody of the two children to the petitioner, and directed a permanent living arrangement for the petitioner and children. The petition regarding residence was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case