State of Maharashtra through nagothane police staion vs sudhil vithoba sable — 329/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090004232026

Filing Number

389/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

Nagothane Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through nagothane police staion

    Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.sudhil vithoba sable

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court found respondent Sudhil Vithoba Sable guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (negligent conduct with fire) and imposed a fine of Rs. 500. The court determined that the accused acted negligently in violation of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and ordered compensation accordingly while providing him an opportunity for reform through judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found respondent Sudhil Vithoba Sable guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (negligent conduct with fire) and imposed a fine of Rs. 500. The court determined that the accused acted negligently in violation of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and ordered compensation accordingly while providing him an opportunity for reform through judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case