State of Maharashtra through nagothane police station vs Sanjay Dattatrey pathare — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090004102026

Filing Number

376/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Nagothane Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through nagothane police station

    Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Dattatrey pathare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by the State of Maharashtra through Nagothane Police Station against Sanjay Dattatrey Pathare. The court found that the accused's detention under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code was improper, as the police failed to establish sufficient grounds for custody and violated procedural safeguards. The court directed the respondent's release and imposed a fine of ₹500 on the investigating officer for procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by the State of Maharashtra through Nagothane Police Station against Sanjay Dattatrey Pathare. The court found that the accused's detention under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code was improper, as the police failed to establish sufficient grounds for custody and violated procedural safeguards. The court directed the respondent's release and imposed a fine of ₹500 on the investigating officer for procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case