State of Maharashtra through roha police station vs shreekursh shivshankar tayade — 301/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090003952026

Filing Number

361/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

332

Police Station

Roha Police Station-6

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through roha police station

    Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.shreekursh shivshankar tayade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court found respondent Shreekursh Shivshankar Tayade guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for causing hurt through negligence. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 500, noting that the accused's rash and negligent actions resulted in injury to the complainant, and directed the accused to pay compensation to the victim as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 301/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found respondent Shreekursh Shivshankar Tayade guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for causing hurt through negligence. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 500, noting that the accused's rash and negligent actions resulted in injury to the complainant, and directed the accused to pay compensation to the victim as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case