State of Maharashtra Through kolad police station vs Santosh jayram ghavate — 299/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG090003932026

Case disposed

Filing Number

359/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

Kolad_Police_Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through kolad police station

Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

Santosh jayram ghavate

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Maharashtra v. Santosh Jayram Ghavate (Case 299/2026) The court convicted respondent Santosh Jayram Ghavate under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (rash or negligent conduct with fire) for violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 (rupees five hundred only) and received instruction regarding proper conduct; the court emphasized that reckless behavior endangering public safety would not be tolerated and warned against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Maharashtra v. Santosh Jayram Ghavate (Case 299/2026) The court convicted respondent Santosh Jayram Ghavate under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (rash or negligent conduct with fire) for violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 (rupees five hundred only) and received instruction regarding proper conduct; the court emphasized that reckless behavior endangering public safety would not be tolerated and warned against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case