State of Maharashtra Through kolad police station vs Santosh jayram ghavate — 299/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090003932026
Filing Number
359/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
299/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
Kolad_Police_Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through kolad police station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh jayram ghavate
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Maharashtra v. Santosh Jayram Ghavate (Case 299/2026) The court convicted respondent Santosh Jayram Ghavate under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (rash or negligent conduct with fire) for violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 (rupees five hundred only) and received instruction regarding proper conduct; the court emphasized that reckless behavior endangering public safety would not be tolerated and warned against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 299/2026
Case Summary: Maharashtra v. Santosh Jayram Ghavate (Case 299/2026) The court convicted respondent Santosh Jayram Ghavate under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (rash or negligent conduct with fire) for violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 (rupees five hundred only) and received instruction regarding proper conduct; the court emphasized that reckless behavior endangering public safety would not be tolerated and warned against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts