State of Maharashtra through Roha Police Station vs Kashinath Rambhau Mhatre — 206/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090003812023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
320/2023
Filing Date
25-05-2023
Registration No
206/2023
Registration Date
25-05-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Roha Police Station-6
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Roha Police Station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
Kashinath Rambhau Mhatre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 14-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal court order (Case No. 206/2023, Roha Police Station) regarding an illegal liquor case against Sharad Kashinath Kotkur. The witness (police officer) testified about seizing 5 liters of liquor during a raid on 05/03/2023. The court examined the prosecution witness's testimony and cross-examination by the defense counsel, with the witness largely maintaining the prosecution's version of events while the defense counsel questioned the credibility of evidence collection methods and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal court order (Case No. 206/2023, Roha Police Station) regarding an illegal liquor case against Sharad Kashinath Kotkur. The witness (police officer) testified about seizing 5 liters of liquor during a raid on 05/03/2023. The court examined the prosecution witness's testimony and cross-examination by the defense counsel, with the witness largely maintaining the prosecution's version of events while the defense counsel questioned the credibility of evidence collection methods and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts