Sunita laxman Shinde vs Roha police station — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG090002802026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

248/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Roha Police Station-6

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunita laxman Shinde

    Adv. Dandekar A. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roha police station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Sunita Shinde's application for release of her seized TVS Scooty, holding that since initial investigation was complete and the Investigating Officer did not require the vehicle for further inquiry, prolonged custody served no purpose. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary, and released the vehicle to the registered owner subject to conditions including a ₹1,00,000 indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell or transfer without court permission, and production before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Sunita Shinde's application for release of her seized TVS Scooty, holding that since initial investigation was complete and the Investigating Officer did not require the vehicle for further inquiry, prolonged custody served no purpose. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary, and released the vehicle to the registered owner subject to conditions including a ₹1,00,000 indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell or transfer without court permission, and production before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case