Gajanan Krushnnath Mhatre vs Maruti Pandurang Mandluskar Advocate - Hafiz S.A. — 152/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090002542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
209/2024
Filing Date
15-04-2024
Registration No
152/2024
Registration Date
15-04-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajanan Krushnnath Mhatre
Adv. Mhatre Y.K.
Respondent(s)
Maruti Pandurang Mandluskar Advocate - Hafiz S.A.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Disposed
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 22-01-2026 | Verification | |
| 27-11-2025 | Verification | |
| 17-10-2025 | Verification | |
| 20-09-2025 | Verification |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Roha dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instrument Act 1881) filed in October 2022 under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The dismissal was ordered because the complainant remained absent since May 2025, failed to appear for verification, and demonstrated reluctance to proceed with the case, making it futile to maintain the matter on the court's docket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Roha dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instrument Act 1881) filed in October 2022 under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The dismissal was ordered because the complainant remained absent since May 2025, failed to appear for verification, and demonstrated reluctance to proceed with the case, making it futile to maintain the matter on the court's docket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts