State of Maharashtra throuhg Exi. De.Bh.1 Alibag vs Kisan Sonu shitole Advocate - Omkar Vishnu Shildankar — 189/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090002362025
Filing Number
218/2025
Filing Date
20-Feb-2025
Registration No
189/2025
Registration Date
20-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
Kolad Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra throuhg Exi. De.Bh.1 Alibag
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kisan Sonu shitole Advocate - Omkar Vishnu Shildankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 due to the Investigation Officer's failure to submit a chemical analysis report despite one year passing since the charge-sheet filing on 20.02.2025. Without this critical forensic evidence, conviction was impossible, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
17-Feb-2026
Report
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
21-Nov-2025
Report
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
22-Aug-2025
Report
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
03-Jun-2025
Report
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
18-Mar-2025
Report
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
20-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 189/2025
The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949 due to the Investigation Officer's failure to submit a chemical analysis report despite one year passing since the charge-sheet filing on 20.02.2025. Without this critical forensic evidence, conviction was impossible, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts