Mahadev Changu Kotkar vs State Of Maharashtra Through Roha Police Station — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG090001782026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

157/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Changu Kotkar

    Adv. SANAP SAMIR PANDURANG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through Roha Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized gold ornaments (worth approximately Rs. 1,77,700) to applicant Mahadev Kotkar until trial conclusion, based on his purchase bills, the accused's no-objection, and Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't be retained longer than necessary. The release was conditioned on an indemnity bond of Rs. 8 lakh, prohibition on selling or altering the ornaments, and production before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized gold ornaments (worth approximately Rs. 1,77,700) to applicant Mahadev Kotkar until trial conclusion, based on his purchase bills, the accused's no-objection, and Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't be retained longer than necessary. The release was conditioned on an indemnity bond of Rs. 8 lakh, prohibition on selling or altering the ornaments, and production before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case