Mahadev Changu Kotkar vs State Of Maharashtra Through Roha Police Station — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG090001782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

157/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Mahadev Changu Kotkar

Adv. SANAP SAMIR PANDURANG

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra Through Roha Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

04-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

23-02-2026

W.S. and Say

13-02-2026

W.S. and Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized gold ornaments (worth approximately Rs. 1,77,700) to applicant Mahadev Kotkar until trial conclusion, based on his purchase bills, the accused's no-objection, and Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't be retained longer than necessary. The release was conditioned on an indemnity bond of Rs. 8 lakh, prohibition on selling or altering the ornaments, and production before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized gold ornaments (worth approximately Rs. 1,77,700) to applicant Mahadev Kotkar until trial conclusion, based on his purchase bills, the accused's no-objection, and Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't be retained longer than necessary. The release was conditioned on an indemnity bond of Rs. 8 lakh, prohibition on selling or altering the ornaments, and production before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case