Rachna Baban Ubhare vs Baban Kisan Ubhare Advocate - Dandekar A. P. — 41/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG090001442022
Next Hearing
09th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
113/2022
Filing Date
04-03-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
04-03-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rachna Baban Ubhare
Adv. Varma D. M.
Respondent(s)
Baban Kisan Ubhare Advocate - Dandekar A. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Hearing
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 13-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready | |
| 22-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 24-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Inquiry Application No. 41/2022 (Rachna v. Baban) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 2,500 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the date of application until final disposal of the main case. The petition for a protective order under Section 18 of the Act was rejected/dismissed as the wife was found to be safe and residing with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Inquiry Application No. 41/2022 (Rachna v. Baban) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 2,500 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the date of application until final disposal of the main case. The petition for a protective order under Section 18 of the Act was rejected/dismissed as the wife was found to be safe and residing with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts