Rachna Baban Ubhare vs Baban Kisan Ubhare Advocate - Dandekar A. P. — 41/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG090001442022
Filing Number
113/2022
Filing Date
04-Mar-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
04-Mar-2022
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rachna Baban Ubhare
Adv. Varma D. M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Baban Kisan Ubhare Advocate - Dandekar A. P.
Case History
-
09-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
10-Mar-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Feb-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
24-Nov-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
17-Oct-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
11-Sep-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
10-May-2025
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
22-Mar-2025
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
31-Jan-2025
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
14-Dec-2024
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
07-Nov-2024
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
30-Sep-2024
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
20-Aug-2024
Hearing
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
15-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Inquiry Application No. 41/2022 (Rachna v. Baban) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 2,500 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the date of application until final disposal of the main case. The petition for a protective order under Section 18 of the Act was rejected/dismissed as the wife was found to be safe and residing with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
05-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
06-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
19-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
27-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
09-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
18-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
09-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
30-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
09-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
16-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
01-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
25-May-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
02-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
16-Jan-2023
A. D. R.
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
12-Nov-2022
A. D. R.
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
18-Oct-2022
A. D. R.
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
13-Aug-2022
A. D. R.
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Roha
-
29-Jul-2022
A. D. R.
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Jul-2022
A. D. R.
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
08-Jun-2022
A. D. R.
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
25-May-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
10-May-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
02-May-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Apr-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
04-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2022
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Inquiry Application No. 41/2022 (Rachna v. Baban) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered the respondent (husband) to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 2,500 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the date of application until final disposal of the main case. The petition for a protective order under Section 18 of the Act was rejected/dismissed as the wife was found to be safe and residing with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts