Pallavi Akshay Kulkarni vs Non — 3/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 21st April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG090000582026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pallavi Akshay Kulkarni
Adv. GHAYLE MAHESH YASHWANT
-
2.Sonali Prathamesh Deshpande
Adv. GHAYLE MAHESH YASHWANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Non
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the application and declared that Pallavi Akshay Kulkarni and Sonal Prathamesh Deshpande are the legal heirs of their deceased parents, Prakash Chandrakant Chaubal and Smita Prakash Chaubal. The court issued a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, enabling the applicants to mutate their names in the property records after payment of court fees, finding no legal impediment since the claim was unchallenged and all required documents were properly submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
The court allowed the application and declared that Pallavi Akshay Kulkarni and Sonal Prathamesh Deshpande are the legal heirs of their deceased parents, Prakash Chandrakant Chaubal and Smita Prakash Chaubal. The court issued a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, enabling the applicants to mutate their names in the property records after payment of court fees, finding no legal impediment since the claim was unchallenged and all required documents were properly submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts