Sau. Savita Kashinath Oval vs Gangaram Devu Mohite Advocate - Dandekar A. P. — 36/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,352,504,506,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090000562018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2018
Filing Date
11-01-2018
Registration No
36/2018
Registration Date
11-01-2018
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau. Savita Kashinath Oval
Adv. Sawant R.B.
Respondent(s)
Gangaram Devu Mohite Advocate - Dandekar A. P.
Rakesh Ravindra Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Praful Tukaram Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Sachin Haribhau Jadhav
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Hvrushikesh Ravindra Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Sangita Janardan Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Rohit Ravindra Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Rajesh Vasant Shinde
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Vikesh Janardan Kamble
Adv. Sawant V. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Disposed
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | B.W._Unready | |
| 12-12-2025 | B.W._Unready | |
| 30-10-2025 | B.W._Unready | |
| 13-09-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Roha) dismissed a criminal complaint filed in 2018 against nine accused persons under IPC sections 341, 352, 504 & 506 r/w 34, and acquitted all accused. The dismissal was granted under CrPC section 256 because the complainant remained absent since 2021 and was reluctant to proceed, rendering the five-year-old case purposeless. Bail bonds were cancelled and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Roha) dismissed a criminal complaint filed in 2018 against nine accused persons under IPC sections 341, 352, 504 & 506 r/w 34, and acquitted all accused. The dismissal was granted under CrPC section 256 because the complainant remained absent since 2021 and was reluctant to proceed, rendering the five-year-old case purposeless. Bail bonds were cancelled and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts