State of Maharashtra through Kolad Police Station vs Yashwant Marya Surve — 34/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG090000342025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2025
Filing Date
03-01-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
03-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Roha
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
82
Police Station
Kolad_Police_Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Kolad Police Station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Marya Surve
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C Roha
Disposed
B.W._Ready
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-01-2026 | B.W._Ready | |
| 13-10-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 25-07-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 20-05-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, finding the case could not proceed without the critical chemical analysis report proving the nature of the seized substance. Despite over 14 months passing since the charge-sheet filing, the investigation officer failed to submit this essential evidence, making conviction impossible. The case was closed under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, with police records retained for potential reopening if the report materializes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Roha Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of liquor possession charges under section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, finding the case could not proceed without the critical chemical analysis report proving the nature of the seized substance. Despite over 14 months passing since the charge-sheet filing, the investigation officer failed to submit this essential evidence, making conviction impossible. The case was closed under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, with police records retained for potential reopening if the report materializes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts