Rashami Ravindra Tilak vs Khopoli Police Station — 158/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG080018942025
e-Filing Number
29-12-2025
Filing Number
1601/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
158/2025
Registration Date
29-12-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rashami Ravindra Tilak
Adv. Rani Vasant Pawar
Respondent(s)
Khopoli Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 28-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 07-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 158/2025 Court's Decision: The court granted Rashmi Ravindra Tilak's petition and ordered the return of Rs. 2,89,445 seized during a cybercrime investigation. The petitioner was defrauded through a cyber scam involving threatening calls about drug possession, leading her to transfer Rs. 45,09,998 across multiple bank accounts. Police seized Rs. 2,89,445 as evidence. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover these funds as there was no claim by any other party, and holding the money indefinitely served no purpose. The funds were to be returned subject to a bond, with a detailed inventory to be prepared before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 158/2025 Court's Decision: The court granted Rashmi Ravindra Tilak's petition and ordered the return of Rs. 2,89,445 seized during a cybercrime investigation. The petitioner was defrauded through a cyber scam involving threatening calls about drug possession, leading her to transfer Rs. 45,09,998 across multiple bank accounts. Police seized Rs. 2,89,445 as evidence. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover these funds as there was no claim by any other party, and holding the money indefinitely served no purpose. The funds were to be returned subject to a bond, with a detailed inventory to be prepared before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts