Rashami Ravindra Tilak vs Khopoli Police Station — 158/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG080018942025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

1601/2025

Filing Date

29-12-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

29-12-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar

Judge

1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Rashami Ravindra Tilak

Adv. Rani Vasant Pawar

Respondent(s)

Khopoli Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

28-02-2026

Reply/Say

07-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 158/2025 Court's Decision: The court granted Rashmi Ravindra Tilak's petition and ordered the return of Rs. 2,89,445 seized during a cybercrime investigation. The petitioner was defrauded through a cyber scam involving threatening calls about drug possession, leading her to transfer Rs. 45,09,998 across multiple bank accounts. Police seized Rs. 2,89,445 as evidence. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover these funds as there was no claim by any other party, and holding the money indefinitely served no purpose. The funds were to be returned subject to a bond, with a detailed inventory to be prepared before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 158/2025 Court's Decision: The court granted Rashmi Ravindra Tilak's petition and ordered the return of Rs. 2,89,445 seized during a cybercrime investigation. The petitioner was defrauded through a cyber scam involving threatening calls about drug possession, leading her to transfer Rs. 45,09,998 across multiple bank accounts. Police seized Rs. 2,89,445 as evidence. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover these funds as there was no claim by any other party, and holding the money indefinitely served no purpose. The funds were to be returned subject to a bond, with a detailed inventory to be prepared before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case