Excise Department vs Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak — 952/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080016142025
Filing Number
1357/2025
Filing Date
07-11-2025
Registration No
952/2025
Registration Date
07-11-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Excise Department
Respondent(s)
Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 952/2025 Court Decision: The accused Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak was acquitted (निर्दोष मुक्त) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 35 sealed bottles of domestic liquor valued at approximately Rs. 1,400 with intent to sell. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police seized the liquor and presented two panchas (witnesses) who testified about the seizure, the court found critical deficiencies: (1) no chemical analysis report of the seized liquid was submitted to confirm it was actually illegal alcohol; (2) the witnesses gave contradictory statements inconsistent with their police statements; and (3) without chemical examination and corroborating evidence, the court could not conclusively establish the accused possessed contraband liquor for sale. The prosecution's case collapsed due to insufficient and uncertain evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 952/2025 Court Decision: The accused Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak was acquitted (निर्दोष मुक्त) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 35 sealed bottles of domestic liquor valued at approximately Rs. 1,400 with intent to sell. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police seized the liquor and presented two panchas (witnesses) who testified about the seizure, the court found critical deficiencies: (1) no chemical analysis report of the seized liquid was submitted to confirm it was actually illegal alcohol; (2) the witnesses gave contradictory statements inconsistent with their police statements; and (3) without chemical examination and corroborating evidence, the court could not conclusively establish the accused possessed contraband liquor for sale. The prosecution's case collapsed due to insufficient and uncertain evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts