Excise Department vs Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak — 952/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG080016142025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1357/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

952/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar

Judge

1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

Excise Department

Respondent(s)

Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak

Hearing History

Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

06-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

28-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 952/2025 Court Decision: The accused Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak was acquitted (निर्दोष मुक्त) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 35 sealed bottles of domestic liquor valued at approximately Rs. 1,400 with intent to sell. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police seized the liquor and presented two panchas (witnesses) who testified about the seizure, the court found critical deficiencies: (1) no chemical analysis report of the seized liquid was submitted to confirm it was actually illegal alcohol; (2) the witnesses gave contradictory statements inconsistent with their police statements; and (3) without chemical examination and corroborating evidence, the court could not conclusively establish the accused possessed contraband liquor for sale. The prosecution's case collapsed due to insufficient and uncertain evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 952/2025 Court Decision: The accused Shatrughan Pakhelal Bosak was acquitted (निर्दोष मुक्त) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 35 sealed bottles of domestic liquor valued at approximately Rs. 1,400 with intent to sell. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police seized the liquor and presented two panchas (witnesses) who testified about the seizure, the court found critical deficiencies: (1) no chemical analysis report of the seized liquid was submitted to confirm it was actually illegal alcohol; (2) the witnesses gave contradictory statements inconsistent with their police statements; and (3) without chemical examination and corroborating evidence, the court could not conclusively establish the accused possessed contraband liquor for sale. The prosecution's case collapsed due to insufficient and uncertain evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case