Maheshwari Fuel Chemical Pvt. Ltd. Through Animesh Ashok Maheshwari vs M/s. Swami Samrth Marketing-1 Advocate - S.S.Jitekar — 922/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080015972017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1297/2017
Filing Date
04-11-2017
Registration No
922/2017
Registration Date
04-11-2017
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maheshwari Fuel Chemical Pvt. Ltd. Through Animesh Ashok Maheshwari
Adv. Patankar S.P.
Respondent(s)
M/s. Swami Samrth Marketing-1 Advocate - S.S.Jitekar
Shruti Sunil Sahastrabuddhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Disposed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 12-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 29-11-2025 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 03-10-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Maheshwari Fuel Chem Pvt. Ltd. against M/s. Swami Samarth Marketing for want of prosecution. The accused was discharged from all charges as the complainant failed to take effective steps despite multiple opportunities and specific court directions, and neither the complainant nor his advocate appeared for the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Maheshwari Fuel Chem Pvt. Ltd. against M/s. Swami Samarth Marketing for want of prosecution. The accused was discharged from all charges as the complainant failed to take effective steps despite multiple opportunities and specific court directions, and neither the complainant nor his advocate appeared for the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts