Vasant Raghoba Ambre vs Sulochana Tukaram Dalvi — 64/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080015262023
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
12-09-2023
Filing Number
220/2023
Filing Date
25-09-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
25-09-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasant Raghoba Ambre
Adv. RITESH RAMESH PATIL
Yogesh Ashok Ambre
Adv. RITESH RAMESH PATIL
Respondent(s)
Sulochana Tukaram Dalvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 02-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 22-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 02-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: Defendant No. 12's application for condonation of delay in filing written statement was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file the written statement on record, citing old age and continuous illness as valid reasons for the delay, despite the nearly 16-month gap since summons service. However, the defendant must pay costs of Rs. 1,500 to the plaintiffs as a condition precedent, failing which the order will automatically be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Defendant No. 12's application for condonation of delay in filing written statement was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file the written statement on record, citing old age and continuous illness as valid reasons for the delay, despite the nearly 16-month gap since summons service. However, the defendant must pay costs of Rs. 1,500 to the plaintiffs as a condition precedent, failing which the order will automatically be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts