State of Maharashtra vs Rajesh Prasadi Sing — 148/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080014912024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
1295/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
148/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
FIR Details
FIR Number
190
Police Station
Khopoli Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Prasadi Sing
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 08-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajesh Prasadi Sing (148/2024) The court recorded testimonies from the investigating police officer (Sarita Mahesh Pardeshi) regarding charges of criminal intimidation and outraging modesty. The complainant alleged the accused followed her on a motorcycle on September 1-2, 2024, and made inappropriate advances. The investigation included seizure of the motorcycle, photographs, and statements from witnesses. The cross-examination revealed significant procedural gaps including failure to conduct scene panchnama, lack of CCTV footage verification, no vehicle ownership documentation, and missing mobile location data. The court accepted post-hearing statements and concluded proceedings on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajesh Prasadi Sing (148/2024) The court recorded testimonies from the investigating police officer (Sarita Mahesh Pardeshi) regarding charges of criminal intimidation and outraging modesty. The complainant alleged the accused followed her on a motorcycle on September 1-2, 2024, and made inappropriate advances. The investigation included seizure of the motorcycle, photographs, and statements from witnesses. The cross-examination revealed significant procedural gaps including failure to conduct scene panchnama, lack of CCTV footage verification, no vehicle ownership documentation, and missing mobile location data. The court accepted post-hearing statements and concluded proceedings on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts