State of Maharashtra vs Rajesh Prasadi Sing — 148/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG080014912024

Filing Number

1295/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

148/2024

Registration Date

03-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar

Judge

1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

190

Police Station

Khopoli Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Prasadi Sing

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajesh Prasadi Sing (148/2024) The court recorded testimonies from the investigating police officer (Sarita Mahesh Pardeshi) regarding charges of criminal intimidation and outraging modesty. The complainant alleged the accused followed her on a motorcycle on September 1-2, 2024, and made inappropriate advances. The investigation included seizure of the motorcycle, photographs, and statements from witnesses. The cross-examination revealed significant procedural gaps including failure to conduct scene panchnama, lack of CCTV footage verification, no vehicle ownership documentation, and missing mobile location data. The court accepted post-hearing statements and concluded proceedings on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  15. 20-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  19. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  20. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  21. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  22. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur

  23. 03-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajesh Prasadi Sing (148/2024) The court recorded testimonies from the investigating police officer (Sarita Mahesh Pardeshi) regarding charges of criminal intimidation and outraging modesty. The complainant alleged the accused followed her on a motorcycle on September 1-2, 2024, and made inappropriate advances. The investigation included seizure of the motorcycle, photographs, and statements from witnesses. The cross-examination revealed significant procedural gaps including failure to conduct scene panchnama, lack of CCTV footage verification, no vehicle ownership documentation, and missing mobile location data. The court accepted post-hearing statements and concluded proceedings on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case